| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/gforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/05/2011 21:19:52
|
mhearne
Joined: 18/06/2007 18:53:19
Messages: 14
Offline
|
We just had a question from one of the users of our maps on Makati and Pasig - he pointed out that these are major metropolitan areas in Manila and he asked why the populations are so low. Are the populations for these areas included in the population for Manila?
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/gforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 11/05/2011 21:32:59
|
marc
Joined: 08/12/2005 07:39:47
Messages: 4501
Offline
|
low? The population is simply missing. Please feel free to add it:
http://www.geonames.org/manual.html
Best
Marc
|
 |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/gforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 12/05/2011 01:38:28
|
mhearne
Joined: 18/06/2007 18:53:19
Messages: 14
Offline
|
On further inspection, there is a larger issue in that the population listed for Manila seems to be the population for Metro Manila, as described here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metro_Manila
It seems like each of the 16 cities that make up the metro area (Manila, Makati, Pasig, etc.) should each have their own populations. I suppose I can do this, but I don't know if there is a geonames classification for metropolitan regions, or only administrative divisions like cities, villages, etc.
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/gforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 15/05/2011 18:08:14
|
marc
Joined: 08/12/2005 07:39:47
Messages: 4501
Offline
|
There is no special classification system for metropolitan regions.
Marc
|
 |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/gforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 17/05/2011 22:55:38
|
jenette
Joined: 17/05/2011 22:52:15
Messages: 1
Offline
|
Makati is a business area, and it is not that big compared to other cities nearby. Probably that's the reason why.
|
|
|
 |
|
|