Author |
Message |
28/12/2023 22:02:45
|
paulineberens
Joined: 27/12/2021 12:44:17
Messages: 2
Offline
|
Please remove this Besedino pointer referring to nothing:
https://www.geonames.org/576728/besedino.html
The right one which is pointing to a village is
https://www.geonames.org/576729/besedino.html
|
|
|
11/10/2024 21:03:26
|
IbrahimKumar
Joined: 02/03/2024 10:56:59
Messages: 9
Offline
|
He visto que existe un duplicado en las siguientes posiciones:
https://www.geonames.org/10227382/hatta-fort.html
https://www.geonames.org/10244619/hatta-fort-hotel.html
La primero está mal. En la posición que indica no hay ningún hotel.
Por favor, ¿podríais eliminarla?
Muchas gracias
|
|
|
11/10/2024 21:21:11
|
marc
Joined: 08/12/2005 07:39:47
Messages: 4472
Offline
|
muchas gracias.
Marc
|
|
|
|
19/10/2024 18:44:42
|
IbrahimKumar
Joined: 02/03/2024 10:56:59
Messages: 9
Offline
|
Hi Marc
I found this other duplicate:
https://www.geonames.org/291362/wadi-munay-i.html
https://www.geonames.org/389982/wadi-munay-i.html
The first one is correct. The second one is not, since the Wādī Munay‘ī is a tributary of the Wadi Al Qor.
Please, could you delete the 389982?
Thank you very much
|
|
|
23/10/2024 17:29:40
|
marc
Joined: 08/12/2005 07:39:47
Messages: 4472
Offline
|
done. Thanks a lot.
Marc
|
|
|
|
08/11/2024 21:23:02
|
IbrahimKumar
Joined: 02/03/2024 10:56:59
Messages: 9
Offline
|
Hello, Marc.
There are 2 items about the same place
292597 Wādī al Bad‘ah - official and correct name. Sources:
https://www.agda.ae/en/catalogue/tna/fco/18/1792/n/1 ;
The national atlas of the United Arab ; Emirates;https://enhg.org/Portals/1/trib/V02N2/TribulusV02N2Searchable.pdf ; https://www.agda.ae/en/catalogue/tna/fco/18/1937/n/1
11780699 Wādī Aswad - That name does not appear in any source - should be deleted ( I have no permission to do so)
Greetings
|
|
|
08/11/2024 21:23:02
|
IbrahimKumar
Joined: 02/03/2024 10:56:59
Messages: 9
Offline
|
Hi Marc
I found this other duplicate:
https://www.geonames.org/412586/wadi-ham.html
https://www.geonames.org/292003/wadi-ham.html
It is the same wadi with two registration numbers. The first one should be removed. The other one is fine, as it corresponds to its mouth.
Thank you very much
|
|
|
08/11/2024 21:23:02
|
IbrahimKumar
Joined: 02/03/2024 10:56:59
Messages: 9
Offline
|
Hello, good morning.
I made a mistake, and I added a new village that was already registered a short distance away.
The record should be deleted:
Derat Eni 12750566 P PPLF farm village
since the correct one is:
Aynī أيني 390009 P PPL populated place
Thank you very much
|
|
|
08/11/2024 21:23:02
|
IbrahimKumar
Joined: 02/03/2024 10:56:59
Messages: 9
Offline
|
Hi Marc
I found this other duplicate:
https://www.geonames.org/8019359/tawian.html
https://www.geonames.org/290670/tawiyayn.html
It is the same city, with several names. One of them should be deleted, although it is advisable to keep all the alternative names.
Thank you very much
|
|
|
12/11/2024 18:23:23
|
jkaz
Joined: 10/11/2024 20:38:16
Messages: 7
Offline
|
Can you delete Punaluu (5852774)? It is a dupe of Punalu‘u (5852773). Thanks!
|
|
|
12/11/2024 18:23:23
|
jwes
Joined: 12/10/2020 22:19:10
Messages: 2
Offline
|
These appear to be the same place.
4937829 Gloucester
4937843 City of Gloucester
|
|
|
09/01/2025 11:13:49
|
IbrahimKumar
Joined: 02/03/2024 10:56:59
Messages: 9
Offline
|
There is confusion with the names of several mountain villages in UAE and Oman, close to the upper reaches of Wadi Khabb.
To try to clear up the confusion, I toured the area and interviewed its inhabitants.
The village located at coordinates 25.62523, 56.1805 is called شِدفة, transcribed into English with the alternative names of Şidfah;Sidakah;Sidaqah;Şidaqah. This data also coincides with the reference given by the National Atlas of the United Arab Emirates.
This has now been corrected, and is listed under ID 12750300.
However, the name of Şidaqah is also added to ID 390013, which corresponds to the village of Jarhi or Dirat Jarhi, according to the same National Atlas of the United Arab Emirates.
I tried to delete the name Şidaqah in ID 390013, leaving only the names Jarhi or Dirat Jarhi, but the system does not allow me to do so.
Could you please delete it yourself?
Thank you very much
|
|
|
12/01/2025 15:34:58
|
marc
Joined: 08/12/2005 07:39:47
Messages: 4472
Offline
|
jwes wrote:
These appear to be the same place.
4937829 Gloucester
4937843 City of Gloucester
The first feature is the populated place, the second the administrative division.
So they are not exactly the same. The first is the seat of the later for instance.
Best Regards
Marc
|
|
|
|
12/01/2025 15:34:58
|
marc
Joined: 08/12/2005 07:39:47
Messages: 4472
Offline
|
IbrahimKumar wrote:
I tried to delete the name Şidaqah in ID 390013, leaving only the names Jarhi or Dirat Jarhi, but the system does not allow me to do so.
Could you please delete it yourself?
Thank you very much
I have deleted the alternate name Şidaqah for 390013
Thanks for your contributions and remarks.
Best Regards
Marc
|
|
|
|
|