<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "PPLX place type hierarchical relationships"]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/4.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "PPLX place type hierarchical relationships"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>PPLX place type hierarchical relationships</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Is there a consistent way to determine which 'parent' populated place (not ADM) a PPLX feature code (section of a populated place) is part of?
I am looking at establishing a direct linkage between London suburbs/neighbourhoods and the London PPLC (id = 2643743) itself.
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/3816.page#11376</guid>
				<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/3816.page#11376</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:26:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wheremonger]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:PPLX place type hierarchical relationships</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The hierarchy table serves exactly for this purpose. However, the current content of the table was mainly automatically generated based on distance and size. For megacities in particular it needs a lot of additional effort to improve those relations.

Marc]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/3816.page#11454</guid>
				<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/3816.page#11454</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 1 May 2012 08:19:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ marc]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>