<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "Doubt about priority of geonames"]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/4.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "Doubt about priority of geonames"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Doubt about priority of geonames</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi Marc:
How are you? Many time without talking with you.  I hope you are fine.

Is there any way in the database tables, of knowing wich data are more importan?

For example:
If I search "railroad station madrid" in www.geonames.org, the first railroads are Atocha and Chamartin (more importants).  Can I do the same feature reading data from the tables?

Thanks in advance and regards,
Isa ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/2872.page#10034</guid>
				<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/2872.page#10034</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 6 Jul 2011 06:24:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ isa]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Doubt about priority of geonames</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ In general the relevance depends on a lot of factors like featurecode, population, elevation, etc. For Stations you can take the presence of a wikipedia link as an indicator.

Marc]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/2872.page#10057</guid>
				<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/2872.page#10057</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 7 Jul 2011 06:34:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ marc]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>