<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "iata/icao in the rdf"]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/4.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "iata/icao in the rdf"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>iata/icao in the rdf</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Why the rdfs related to airports don't have the iata/icao codes as alternate names even if it's shown in it's page at geonames ? Or am I missing something ?

Example: 
http://www.geonames.org/6299418/nice-cote-d-azur.html
http://sws.geonames.org/6299418/about.rdf
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/2827.page#9904</guid>
				<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/2827.page#9904</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:45:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ milena]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:iata/icao in the rdf</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ We had to remove the pseudo language codes from the rdf extract because users complained that they are not valid iso language codes.

Marc]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/2827.page#9916</guid>
				<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/2827.page#9916</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:48:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ marc]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>