<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the topic "Mountain Ranges... not underseas"]]></title>
		<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/4.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the topic "Mountain Ranges... not underseas"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Mountain Ranges... not underseas</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There seems to be a problem in the way that mountain ranges are identified.

For example, if you do a search of "Sierra Nevada" in the US and select the one whose feature class is "range", its icon is "u" (which seems to correspond to "underseas"). 

The same problem seems to occur with feature class of "flat." 

http://www.geonames.org/maps/google_36.579_-118.293.html

Moreover, the choice for "range" does *not* appear under the "mountain, hill, rock" tree menu on the maps. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1194.page#5114</guid>
				<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1194.page#5114</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:04:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ thams]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:Mountain Ranges... not underseas</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Thanks, you are right. These toponyms should not have the 'undersea' feature class. I have changed them to 'mountain/hill/rock'.

Best

Marc]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1194.page#5118</guid>
				<link>http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1194.page#5118</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:34:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ marc]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>