http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/4.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net Note 2 changes: - addition of node - no attribute 'secure="true"' in node Can you change the crossdomain.xml on both locations to the updated version? I'm not sure this will fix my problem, but at least your server will be more compliant with the current state of affairs in flash-land. Thanks! ]]> http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4761 http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4761 GMT http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4764 http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4764 GMT http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4766 http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4766 GMT response.setHeader(”Pragma”,”no-cache”); //HTTP 1.0 response.setHeader(”Cache-Control”,”no-cache”); //HTTP 1.1 response.setDateHeader (”Expires”, 0); //prevents caching at the proxy server It seems that IE6 does not like the XML context type served up with these headers   These headers are indeed present in the responses from GeoNames. And it's not just XML, also the regular HTML-reponse breaks on this. Now I suppose those headers are there for a good reason, and I can fully appreciate it if you're not willing to remove them. I guess it's quite likely that it would break someone's code out there if you did. We'll work around this with a proxy on our own server. Cheers, ]]> http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4767 http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4767 GMT http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4831 http://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/1089.page#4831 GMT