| Author |
Message |
|
|
Oops, forgot to login to write the last post. Anyways, it was mine
Anonymous wrote:
Hi,
We are currently creating a start-up that will make use of the Geonames dataset to locate cities. Geonames will be the first open source project we give money to, as soon as we make some (We use quite a lot of Open source stuff, and will give money back whenever we can : "We love open source because it is open source, not just because it's free"). Once we have money, I have nothing against buying support / updates / whatever concerning Open Source.
My worry was about the project's goal. I completly understand the fact that any community-driven project goes wherever the community wants it to go. I just wanted to make sure about the good intentions
Concerning my contribution to Geonames: The first thing I might be able to contribute is a list of Wines (crus) associated to their respective cities. (It is not currently associated to cities, only zipcodes, so there might be some work involved..) (so that people can easily GIS localize wines..). Concerning INSEE Names, well, I am currently (struggling to/working on) to get Lucene/Compass to work correctly and efficiently, in order to index all the city names. Once all this is working, fuzzy-matching INSEE Names against All possible names of each PPL feature should give pretty good results. I'll spend some time hacking on that once my search engine works
In any case, if I do some programming tasks that might be useful for Geonames, I'll for sure contribute it.
Regards,
Sami Dalouche
|
 |
|
|
Hi,
Something I am wondering about is the goal of the Geonames Project. Does it aim at staying a 100% Free, not-for-profit organization, that gives away its database, source code, etc, or does it plan to become a commercial project at some point, keeping some data from the public and only opening a [restricted] WS access ?
In fact, my main worry is that the available database dumps contain all the cities, and GIS features, but do not contain the references to the external sources (for instance, for each feature, we only have the geonamesId, not the GNIS FeatureID). So we don't know which feature is a GNS one, which feature comes from another website, etc.
This means that if one day, geonames.org becomes commercial, it means all geonames users have no way to fork and continue to update the system...
So, it is really weird, because on the one side, I see that there is some source code (only client side though for now) available for free, and some data available for free, but on the other side, I wonder what the plans are..
Thanks,
Sami Dalouche
|
 |
|
|
|
|