GeoNames Home | Postal Codes | Download / Webservice | About 

GeoNames Forum
  [Search] Search   [Recent Topics] Recent Topics   [Groups] Back to home page 
[Register] Register /  [Login] Login 
Are estates technically "populated place"?  XML
Forum Index -> General
Author Message
[Post New]16/02/2024 09:21:20
    Subject: Are estates technically "populated place"?
[Up]
hyperknf



Joined: 05/12/2023 13:33:23
Messages: 2
Offline
Hello! I'm recently editing the populated place entries in Hong Kong,
and as some of you might know, Hong Kong has a lot of estates.
I wanted to know if they are counted as "populated place"s (P class code), so I can add them. Thanks!
Jack / HyperKNF
[Post New]16/02/2024 10:02:39
    Subject: Re:Are estates technically "populated place"?
[Up]
marc



Joined: 08/12/2005 07:39:47
Messages: 4418
Offline
Yes, I think PPLX (section of populated place) is a good featurecode.

Marc
[WWW]
[Post New]21/05/2024 14:58:55
    Subject: Re:Are estates technically "populated place"?
[Up]
marens101



Joined: 21/05/2024 13:02:11
Messages: 1
Offline
Hey!

I just wanted to clarify this one as well.

My interpretation of the feature codes was that PPL would only really be for cities/towns/etc and PPLX for subsections (e.g. a CBD/central business district)

Following that, I would assume the S/EST would be a more fitting class/code for an estate
From the code list:

EST estate(s) a large commercialized agricultural landholding with associated buildings and other facilities
ESTX section of estate
 

And in the case of Hong Kong, most mansions would really fall under S/BLDA

BLDA apartment building a building containing several individual apartments
 


Does that check out or am I misinterpreting something?
 
Forum Index -> General
Go to:   
Powered by JForum 2.1.5 © JForum Team